Sectors
GPR Survey by Sector — Who We Work For
The radar is the same. What changes is the consequence of getting it wrong, the format the client needs and the authority that has to sign it off.
Since 2003 we have surveyed over 1.5 lakh km by radar, held 100 km a day at peak and delivered 700 KM inside 30 days without hiring a single system. A ₹1,00,000 per-project minimum applies outside Delhi NCR to cover rig and crew movement from Faridabad. NCR sites have no such floor.
Quick AnswerMezux Touch delivers GPR survey and trenchless works across six sectors in India — telecom operators, city gas distribution, power utilities, metro and railways, highways and expressways, and water and sewerage networks. Each sector page sets out the specific detection problem, the deliverable format and the approval route for that industry.
Sectors
Six sectors, six different definitions of a serious mistake
Why the sector changes the survey
A struck water line is a wet trench and a repair bill. A struck gas main is an evacuation and a regulatory notification. A struck HT cable is a personal-injury event. The physics of the survey does not change between those three, but the confidence threshold does — and so does how readily we recommend physically verifying a crossing rather than relying on detection alone.
Deliverable format changes too. A telecom operator wants a chainage-referenced crossing schedule their site engineer can work from. A metro general consultant wants SUE quality levels stated per element so the design assurance process can adopt them. A water board wants a maintainable GIS record rather than a one-off drawing. Issuing the wrong format is how a technically sound survey ends up unused.
And the approval route differs. Pipeline operator consent runs on a different timeline to municipal permission; railway crossings run on possessions; highway work runs through the road authority. Our in-house RoW desk carries each of these as its own process rather than as one form with a different address.
Numbers we can put a project name against
Not sure which sector page fits your project?
Send the scope and the client type — we will tell you which confidence level and deliverable format the work actually needs.
Talk to the Survey TeamGPR by sector — why the sector changes the survey and detailed questions
The radar is identical across sectors. What changes is the consequence of getting it wrong, the format the client needs, and the authority that has to sign it off. A struck water line is a wet trench and a repair bill. A struck gas main is an evacuation and a regulatory notification. A struck HT cable is a personal-injury event. The physics does not change between those three, but the confidence threshold does, and so does how readily we recommend physically verifying a crossing rather than relying on detection alone.
How the deliverable differs by sector
A telecom operator wants a chainage-referenced crossing schedule their site engineer can work from. A metro general consultant wants SUE quality levels stated per element so the design assurance process can adopt them directly. A gas licensee wants routes in their own layer with a continuous cover record that doubles as a compliance document. A water board wants a maintainable GIS record their own team can extend. A highway authority wants pavement condition alongside utilities. Issuing the wrong format is how a technically sound survey ends up unused.
How the approval route differs
Pipeline operator consent runs on a different timeline to municipal permission. Railway crossings run on possessions granted months ahead. Highway work goes through the road authority with its own crossing standards. Industrial estate work runs through an estate office and a plant operator's permit system, neither of which answers to a civic calendar. Our in-house RoW desk carries each as its own process rather than as one form with a different address, because treating them alike is the most common reason a corridor stalls.
Beyond the basics
Does the survey method change by sector? No, the physics is identical. What changes is the confidence threshold, the deliverable format and the approval route.
Why is gas work treated differently? Because the failure mode is an incident rather than a repair. Detection alone is not accepted as clearance at critical crossings.
What does a metro consultant need that others do not? SUE quality levels stated per element and a residual risk register written for direct adoption into the project risk register.
Can one survey serve several sectors? Sometimes on a shared corridor, and it costs each party less. The deliverable then has to satisfy the strictest requirement among them.
Which sector has the longest approval lead time? Usually railway crossings, because they run on possessions granted months ahead rather than on an administrative queue.
Terms used on this page
Confidence threshold — the reliability required before a finding is accepted as clearance, which varies by consequence. Crossing schedule — a chainage-referenced list of what crosses a route, the telecom deliverable. Quality level — a SUE grading of how utility information was obtained. Cover record — a continuous depth measurement, which on a gas network is a compliance document. Possession — a granted block of time for work on an operational rail alignment.






