Telecom Infrastructure

What our telecom record actually consists of

Three corridors carry most of what a prospective operator would want to test: 135 KM at Bawana, 225 KM for NDMC and 67 KM at Okhla, each completed under multi-authority compliance and, in two cases, materially below approved capex.

They are named with clients and dates rather than described as capability, which means they can be asked about specifically. We would rather be asked what went wrong on them than what went right, because a corridor of that length with no difficult stretches is a corridor somebody is not describing fully.

Beyond those, we are a registered service partner to leading national operators and work both directly and as a specialist subcontractor within EPC packages.

Working directly against working within a package

A direct engagement lets us schedule survey, permissions and drilling against one another rather than sequentially, which is where most of the time on a rollout is recovered.

Inside an EPC package our scope is narrower and the sequence belongs to someone else, so we say plainly what that changes: we can commit to our own crews and plant, but not to a programme we do not control.

Which arrangement suits a client depends on how their own contracting is structured, and we are happy to work either way provided the boundary is stated rather than assumed.

The part of a rollout clients underestimate

Not the drilling and not the cable. The consent workload — hundreds of small approvals from societies, facility managers, ward offices and estate managers, none of which appear on a network design and none of which a construction schedule accounts for.

We carry that as a tracked workload with named accountability per cluster or corridor rather than as an operational detail, because it is the single most common reason a technically complete rollout has not energised.

Clients who budget for construction and treat approvals as administration are the ones whose programmes report ninety per cent complete for several months.

How we are usually engaged

Directly by operators on their own projects, and as a specialist subcontractor inside EPC packages where the main contractor holds the sequence.

The two are different commitments and we state which applies. Directly, we can commit to a programme because we control the order of work. Inside a package we commit to our own crews, plant and quality but not to a date that depends on others.

That distinction is worth making at tender rather than after award, because a client who believes they have a programme commitment and has not is the one who is disappointed later.

Delivered corridors

135 KM at Bawana, 225 KM for NDMC and 67 KM at Okhla, each completed under multi-authority compliance. We are a registered service partner to leading national operators.

Capacity behind that is 14 owned radar systems and 18 owned HDD rigs, with peak survey output reaching 100 km a day.

Frequently asked questions