Capabilities
Comprehensive Underground Solutions
Building Reliable Underground Networks with Precision, Safety & Engineering Excellence
At Mezux, we provide end-to-end Underground (UG) infrastructure solutions for telecom operators, ISPs, enterprises and government organizations. From route surveys and duct laying to OFC installation, restoration and commissioning, we ensure every project is executed with the highest standards of quality, safety and regulatory compliance.
What truly sets Mezux apart is our approach to challenges. We never say "No" to a project because of its complexity. From long-pending projects to highly complex assignments, our team has consistently completed every project we have undertaken.
Our Core UG Services
- Route Survey & Network Planning
- Trenching & HDPE Duct Laying
- OFC Blowing, Pulling & Splicing
- HDD (Horizontal Directional Drilling)
- Road Cutting & Surface Restoration
- Authority Coordination & Permissions
- Testing, Commissioning & Handover
Quick AnswerWe deliver all five stages of an underground project under one contract: subsurface survey, permissions, trenchless drilling, installation, and restoration closure. The value is not in any single stage but in the fact that a finding in one changes the next the same day.
Why the five stages belong together
Most underground projects buy survey from one company, permissions from a consultant, drilling from a contractor, installation from another and leave restoration closure to whoever is still around.
Each handover is a place where information is lost and accountability thins. A survey finding that should have changed a bore plan sits in a PDF nobody in the drilling team reads.
Holding all five means a finding on Tuesday changes the plan on Wednesday, rather than becoming a variation conversation three weeks later.
Stage one: knowing what is there
GPR survey with electromagnetic locating where the target is conductive, reconciled against whatever records exist, issued as layered CAD and GIS with detection method and confidence held per feature.
Where a decision cannot rest on detection alone we recommend physical verification rather than issuing a confident drawing the data does not support.
Stage two and three: permission and bore
Applications drafted, filed, followed up physically and closed out by our own liaison desk across municipal bodies, PWD, NHAI, railways and metro authorities.
Drilling on eighteen owned rigs across a range of classes, with the bore profile designed against measured ground rather than a standard detail, and the machine matched to the section rather than the contract.
Stage four: installation done properly
Duct installation, fibre blowing and splicing, or utility installation depending on the client. Blowing performance is decided at duct stage, so setout and joint quality get attention that clients rarely see itemised.
OTDR traces are handed over rather than a pass being reported, because the trace is the only honest record of the loss budget.
Stage five: closing out
Reinstatement inspected internally against the authority's specification before the department is called, completion certificates pursued and deposits recovered.
It is the least glamorous stage and the one most often abandoned, which is why an open obligation from an earlier project so often holds up somebody's next application.
Frequently asked questions
Because each handover loses information and thins accountability. Holding all five means a survey finding changes the bore plan the same week rather than becoming a variation later.
Layered CAD and GIS with detection method and confidence per feature, reconciled against existing records, with physical verification recommended where detection alone is insufficient.
Yes, across municipal bodies, PWD, NHAI, railways and metro authorities, including physical follow-up and restoration closure.
Because blowing performance is decided by duct condition, joint quality and route setout. Problems created at duct stage surface weeks later as a blow that will not complete.
Reinstatement inspected internally before the department is called, completion certificates pursued and deposits recovered. It is the stage most often abandoned by others.
Currently buying these five stages separately?
Send the scope — the saving is usually in the handovers rather than in any single stage's rate.
Get A Quote +91 99100 10209Comprehensive underground delivery — the five stages and detailed questions
Mezux Touch delivers underground infrastructure across five stages that clients frequently procure separately: survey, permission, drilling, installation and as-built record. The argument for taking them together is not commercial convenience. It is that the interfaces between stages are where projects actually fail — a survey that arrives after the crew is standing by, a permission that clears when the rig is committed elsewhere, an as-built nobody produced because the contract ended at commissioning.
Why the stages belong together
Survey informs the bore profile, so surveying and drilling under one contract removes the gap where a profile is designed against assumed ground. Permission timing drives mobilisation, so a liaison desk inside the same company can schedule a crew against a file it is actually following rather than against a forecast. And the as-built is only cheap while the ground is open: producing it after reinstatement means resurveying, which costs many times more and yields a worse record. Each interface removed is a category of failure removed.
What a complete delivery contains
A pre-works survey with confidence stated per feature. A permission file with jurisdiction mapped, conditions transcribed into the method statement, and restoration closed with the deposit recovered. A bore profile designed against measured ground with an as-built in plan and long section tied to coordinates. Installation records — OTDR traces per fibre, splice records, duct occupancy where it has value. And a handover record structured so the client's own team can maintain it rather than one that requires us to return for every change.
Beyond the basics
Why procure all five stages together? Because the interfaces are where projects fail — survey arriving late, permission clearing when the rig is committed, as-built nobody produced.
Can we take only some stages? Yes, and many clients do. We say plainly which interface risks that leaves with them rather than pretending the split is neutral.
Why is the as-built cheap only during construction? Because the ground is open and positions are verifiable. Producing it afterwards means resurveying, which costs many times more for a worse record.
What does the handover record contain? Survey, permission closure, bore as-built, installation test records and duct occupancy, structured so your own team can maintain it.
Who is accountable across the stages? One named person per corridor for the whole sequence, which is much of the point of not splitting the contract.
Terms used on this page
Interface risk — the failure mode created where one contracted stage hands over to another. Bore profile — the designed path of a trenchless crossing, in plan and long section. As-built — a record of what was actually installed, as distinct from what was designed. Duct occupancy — how much capacity a duct route retains, which determines future reuse value. Handover record — the maintainable documentation transferred to the client at completion.
Popular searches — complete underground delivery
Related searches
survey to handover in one contract|as built record on handover|RoW closure and deposits|delivered corridors
GPR survey by city
GPR survey Ludhiana|GPR survey Bengaluru|GPR survey Kolkata|GPR survey Kanpur
By sector
HDD trenchless road crossing|NHAI highway utility survey|pipeline leak detection survey
